|Font Size -||-A+A|
He was followed by young Saurabh Tiwary, one of our new age cricketers who frequently make a mockery of boundary ropes (sometimes the groundsman is forced to as well!). He is a big built man, broad shoulders and only occasionally makes a concession to the nudged single; doesnít worry too much about searching for gaps in the field for his idea of an opportunity is the space above the fielder not between him and the next guy! Admittedly he batted after the field restrictions had gone off but his style brought 61 from 37 balls. It was like being at a music festival where Manna Dey and heavy metal were on the same stage!
Meanwhile Kallis was adapting too. He played himself in during the fantastic run chase against the Kings XI (45 from 38 chasing 204?) and when the time came exploded, but stylishly (next 44 from 17). Again he was able to do that because Pandey and Uthappa were hitting the drums on turbo while he was plucking the strings but he showed it is possible to retain the elements of orthodox batting and still make the strike rate look very acceptable.
Both Tendulkar and Kallis probably need to open the batting but they are demonstrating that you do not need to alter your favoured bat speed to score runs. Both batsmen have their game built on precision, the bat comes down at a certain time to be able to hit the ball at a certain spot, the body is ideally positioned for that event. When they try to slog (or anyone for that matter) the bat comes down faster, the head goes out of synch, it looks like a bad dance step. To be honest, I donít know how much longer the game will allow the classicists but what we do now is that such players can be survivors too. Three cheers to that.
The first week has also shown that you cannot really determine how many runs can be scored in the last few overs. 80 is getting scored routinely in the last six against bowlers who havenít exactly grown up playing for Yellow House vs Green House at school. The most obvious reason is that pitches and outfields and boundary lines are stacked in favour of batsmen, and that you are allowed to lose 10 wickets in 20 overs. But I think there is more to it. Like technology opened our eyes to new speeds and storage capacities I think batsmen are also discovering that things are possible which they hadnít been aware of.
For bowlers to go down a similar path (and they have already begun!) they need a bit of help. In the last few days I have had the opportunity to have a quick chat to Daljit Singh at Mohali and Venkat Sundaram at Delhi and I put the same question to both of them.For one game, I asked, why canít you prepare a pitch with some zing in it, where the keeper can feel the ball thudding into his gloves, where the crease becomes what it always was, a safe haven not to be transgressed. For a brief moment their eyes lit up, then they shook their head!
Meanwhile the ICC need to be careful not to go the way of Indian airports where certain people are allowed to circumvent security requirements. Young Stuart Broad needs to realise that he can be pulled up if he commits the same offence others do. It will do him good in the long run but it will also do good to the ICCís credibility.