|Font Size -||-A+A|
I sense that here in England, India is being looked at as an unprincipled bully. It need not be that way and it need not always be true either but in the absence of an open dialogue that is how it is being represented in the media. And so it is on the UDRS, on the issue of unhappy umpires, indeed on almost every aspect of the modern game. It doesn’t help that India sometimes adopts this nouveau-riche attitude of being loud and unaccommodating; my way or no other. I actually believe India had a very valid point on the UDRS; that ball-tracking at normal speed cameras is not much good and that, even in the opinion of the head of Virtual Eye, we might be better off without it. But India is never very keen to explain its stand, preferring instead to make its point of view known to the world through terse statements.
England, for its part, slips into tired cliches about India; to read some of the sports pages here would be to believe that an economic, and more appropriately, a social revolution never took place. To believe that India’s emergence is largely because of Western coaches, that the toughness would never have come about without them is to be lazy and exposes an inability, or an unwillingness, to understand the new globalised twenty-something Indian; and that India’s attitude on the field is but a direct illustration of the attitude of its young entrepreneurs and managers in industry. India is still someone that needs to be withstood, someone who is newly come upon riches and has nothing else to offer.
Why in a debate on the future of Test cricket even the Times of London, a fine newspaper if there was one, did not feel the need to get an Asian point of view. And so there is far too much of this rather unpleasant us-and-them feeling. In some quarters in India we believe that it is our time to give it back to them (having been rather rudely treated on my first tour here I can understand that feeling even if I can never accept it) and that can be short-sighted and distinctly unfruitful. While India bring in substantial revenues to English cricket every four years, England showed their generosity by coming back to play test matches in India after 26/11. That was a great moment, it was one where bonds should have been strengthened and indeed the Chennai test is my favourite among the ninety nine played so far, but I sense we have let it slip. England may seem unwilling to accept the present but India need to show a little more style and grace.
Now, in the undisputed home of test cricket (there isn’t a ticket available for any of the days of this series), two teams stand arrayed against each other but the two countries should not miss the opportunity to understand each other better. England provides more opportunities to cricketers through its leagues and counties than anyone else and there is genuine love for the game here. India is the new market but needs to move from being the merchant to turning statesman, to looking at the world rather than at a region. Irrespective of which way the series goes this is an opportunity that we cannot miss.
For eventually we are bound together by a great game; it may no longer always be noble but it retains many great virtues. Maybe Kipling is right for the ballad continues : “But there is neither East nor West, Border, nor Breed, nor Birth, When two strong men stand face to face, tho’ they come from the ends of the earth!”