Expressindia> Sports
Group Websites
Expressindia
Indian Express
Financial Express
Screen
Loksatta
Channels
Blogs
Astrology
Shopping
Hotels
Tenders
Classifieds


MOST READ




Font Size - -A+A

Umpires robbed England of win in Kanpur: British media

Agencies

Posted: Nov 21, 2008 at 1045 hrs IST
      

London, November 21: : India's Duckworth/Lewis win in the Kanpur one-dayer against England was dubbed 'farcical' by an angry British media, which lambasted umpires Russell Tiffin and Amiesh Sahiba for their "lack of common sense" in conducting the game.

India won by 16 runs in the 49-overs-a-side match that started late and ended early under fading light, much to the frustration of English team which is now 0-3 down in the seven-match series.

English skipper Kevin Pietersen minced no words in saying that his side had been robbed of a win by the way officials conducted the match and his views were seconded by an equally furious media in London.

"The International Cricket Council is always changing its playing regulations, but one rule that it claims umpires can apply at any time is common sense, something utterly lacking in Kanpur," wrote 'The Daily Telegraph'.

"...you could understand their (England players') anger at seeing their best chance of winning a game in this one-day series disappear at the click of a light meter," it said.

Putting the blame squarely on Tiffin -- the senior of the two officials -- the newspaper said the match could have done with a shorter lunch break, as suggested by Pietersen and England coach Peter Moores. The daily said deducting just one over a side after a 45-minute delay was also a logic-defying decision.

"He (Tiffin) should have shortened the lunch interval, which umpires can do, following the one-day farce at Edgbaston last year, when play was called off just one over short of constituting a game," the newspaper said.

"Their biggest mistake was made at the start, when Tiffin announced that the match would be 49-overs a side. Fitting that many in after losing 45 minutes at the start was always overly optimistic and, given a 10-minute tweak at lunch, 45 overs-a-side would have been about perfect."

'The Guardian' was also scathing in its criticism of how the game went about and said, "The match was delayed by 45 minutes for morning mist, but nonsensically the overs were reduced only by one over per side to 49. By 4.30pm, the light was predictably fading, and even though England's spinners were bowling, umpires Russell Tiffin and Amiesh Saheba offered India bad light and victory by the dreaded Duckworth-Lewis calculations.”

"Appoint an umpire called Tiffin to a match involving India and England and it is to be expected that he comes over all 'old colonial' and stops for tea at 4.30," the newspaper fumed.

'The Independent' felt the umpires robbed England of what could have been a hard-fought and deserving win. "The Kanpur smog ruined Englands chances of fighting their way back in to the seven match series when the umpires offered India's batsmen the light with the game delicately placed.

"India still required 43 in nine overs with five wickets in hand when the match officials deemed the conditions not to be fit, a decision that robbed England the chance of a victory they had worked so hard to achieve," the daily wrote.

'The Times' echoed the sentiment and said the officials' surprised one and all with their decisions despite being well aware of the weather conditions in the Indian city.

"For all that, questions need to be asked over why the game was allowed to end before time. Anybody who has been in Kanpur this week knew that the light starts to fade around four o'clock in the afternoon.

"The second mistake of the officials was to dock just a single over from each innings instead of reducing the break between innings. Those two decisions created a farce that was waiting to happen," it said.

Wide-selling tabloid, 'The Daily Mail' described the umpires' decision "crass" and wrote, "Cricket's capacity to shoot itself in the foot knows no bounds and the farcical end to the third one-day international here yesterday was another example of rules and regulations holding sway over the interests of spectators and simple common sense. At the end of it, England's slim chances of taking anything from this series had all but disappeared."

Rate this article
 
Post Comment :
Name * Message *
Email ID *
Subject *
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.
  • Comments
     
Common Sense
by Dinesh on 2008-11-21 21:23:16.258685+05:30
That 's right. Umpire must use common sense in games played by one of the white teams. And the common sense is" help white team win the matches like they did in sydney, Aust. Common sense also means impose 8 times more fine on players of subcontinent for similar infringement. Example Zaheer's (80%)fine versus Watson's (10%). In the interest of the game those upmires not having such a common sense must be removed. You can not let a white team lose like that. Come on use your common sense. So follow your common sense in next game if you want to be an umpire otherwise English media and ICC will ban you.
Reply | Forword
British media have no right to umpire Cricket
by Puthenthope on 2008-11-21 21:05:21.932621+05:30
Hi Brits, Shut your mouth and focus on next 4 games if you want to win. This is a new breed of Indians. Can you win at least one game to save your ego?In Cricket there are umpires to do their job. The media who criticized the umpires should be ashamed because they are strictly following the regulations and no question about it.
Reply | Forword
India's win at Kanpur
by N.RAJ VIGNESH on 2008-11-21 19:13:41.185845+05:30
Even if the match was played, I am sure India would have definitely made it. England should not try to make these sort of remarks on the Umpires or the Duckworth Lewis method of declaring the results. I do agree that Duckworth Lewis method is bit harsh, but is always to the disadvantage of the team batting second. In the instant case, India has made it well ahead and were in a very convenient position. Even if the match was continued, imagine for a while that there was no bad light, the match would have gone in favour of India with minimum 2 to 3 overs to spare. I wish English team to concentrate in their future matches instead of brooding over whatever that has happened. This sort of attitude can be expected only from Aussies and not from English.
Reply | Forword
Umpire robbed Engla...
by Dharam Pal on 2008-11-21 18:57:55.870471+05:30
England could have won if the life had not faded. India!s chances were higher. Till the play ended India had the upper hand. The conjectures by the England Captain and their media are only speculative. Umpires have been unnecessarily put on trial. Captains should learn to be graceful in defeat as much as they enjoy victory.
Reply | Forword
English media
by zafar on 2008-11-21 18:54:19.749152+05:30
Had it been England winning as per DL rule everything under the sky would have been transparent.We are capable of winning the series without that win as well
Reply | Forword
© 2009 The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved
The Indian Express Group | Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Work With Us | Site Map