Expressindia> Sports
Group Websites
Expressindia
Indian Express
Financial Express
Screen
Loksatta
Channels
Blogs
Astrology
Shopping
Hotels
Tenders
Classifieds
ExpressQnA


MOST READ

Ads by Google



Font Size - -A +A

Different means, same end

Harsha Bhogle

Posted online: Thursday , April 03, 2008 at 2340 hrs IST
      

: Two cricketers, so different, as different as Prakash

Karat is from Manmohan Singh, and yet playing with the same objective, made a dreadful Test memorable.

Virender Sehwag is the racy thriller, Rahul Dravid the sweeping epic, Sehwag strings together some great skits, Dravid writes a thesis, Sehwag is instinctive, Dravid erudite. Sehwag will yodel like Kishore Kumar, Dravid sing Jagjit Singh’s ghazal. Both have their place and neither can be belittled. They make for a great buffet.

There is no doubt that ten thousand runs put you in an elite club. It means you have countered different conditions, conquered fitness issues, won over fatigue, travel, changes in your own personality and the little matter of opposition bowlers trying to knock your head off, as you pass through different stages in a career. There is a point of view, debatable, that if you play 120 Tests, ten thousand runs would be inevitable. It belittles the achievement. Not everyone is good enough to be selected 120 times by his country and average 55 over that period. It’s time to bury theories and stand up and applaud Rahul Dravid as one of the all-time greats, someone who has played with utmost dignity and has rarely given less than what he was capable of for his side. It is a combination that comes rarely.

Cricket hardly ever throws up a complete product like Dravid. To that extent, he is the only successor we have had to the great Sunil Gavaskar. And like with all cricketers, Dravid’s success is more temperament than talent or technique. Both are over-rated qualities. Like Glenn McGrath, Dravid might well say, “I knew my body and I knew my game”. Dravid’s game is built around simplicity and very often there is great beauty in simplicity.

Perhaps the best comment on Dravid’s great accomplishment came from another fine son of Bangalore, Gundappa Vishwanath who said Dravid was the better player of the two. It is a correct assessment but it is in making it that Vishwanath’s greatness lies. As a batsman, he was classy and honest and it is fantastic to see that those qualities have not deserted him in retirement when bitterness befriends people. I asked Dravid once how it felt to be better than the man he idolised. It is one of the most amazing moments in a person’s career and one that presents itself to very few. In that wonderfully respectful manner, he sidestepped it but he was aware of it.

I hope he scripts many more of these stylish, critical innings. There is much to learn from Dravid the person and the cricketer because while 20-20 may be upon us, and might require different skills, the toughness of character that has been Dravid’s hallmark will never go out of fashion. He once told me that the ultimate reward for a sportsman is to be respected in both dressing rooms; your own and that of your opponents. If he doesn’t score another run, he will have that for life.

Virender Sehwag is very unlike Dravid; indeed he is very unlike anybody at all and we must celebrate that. Where a Dravid would, in classical tradition, wear a bowler down and force him to bowl to the batsman’s strengths, Sehwag sees an opportunity in every ball; an opportunity to land a punch on the opponent. It is not a misplaced metaphor for there is a lot of the boxer in Sehwag. His approach is direct, seemingly brutal, but has its origins in extraordinary self-belief. He had to have it for had he questioned his style, he would have ended up being someone else.

It requires a brave man to back himself with the kind of game Sehwag has when things go wrong.

“I play the ball, not the bowler” he once said and that is important because reputations have always mattered little to him. It is a great philosophy but it is only a rare cricketer who can forget the previous ball and approach the next one like it is the first. His success lies not as much in finding shots to play off a ball but in doing so over a fairly long innings. And you can only do that if your game is built on an inherently uncomplicated approach. It is not difficult to see why two successive test captains, each so completely different from him, fought to have him in the side even when things were not going his way.

Let’s celebrate Dravid and Sehwag, let’s celebrate the diversity for that is what makes sport so compelling.

Ads by Google
Rate this article
 
Post Comment :
Name * Message *
Email ID *
Subject *
TERMS OF USE:
The views represented here are not neccesarily endorsed by www.expressindia.com and its allied websites. All messages will be moderated and no message that has inflammatory, abusive, derogatory language or any language deemed unfit for publication by the editor will be displayed. Though it will be endeavoured that as many messages as possible be displayed, there will be time lag between the submission and publication of the messages. The website reserves the right to publish or reject any message.
I agree to the terms of use.
  • Comments
     
bhogle analysis
by mani c d s on 2008-04-16 20:19:00.934218+05:30
interesting analysis.but Viswanath was more attractive to watch than is Dravid. Like there was a difference between Gavaskar and brother-in-law. Certainly Dravid is a worthy successor to Gavaskar. But don't forget that the veterans were little masters, while Dravid stands taller literally. Like the way Dravid straight drove Allan McDonald for a six in South Africa.
Reply | Forword | Report Abuse
VISHY IS EQUALLY GREAT
by syed afroz ashrafi on 2008-04-06 20:46:23.190873+05:30
Chennai , Harsha , i quite agree , was poetry in motion and a celebration of the musical senses if any one had . Dravid having played 120 test matches and joining the elite club is indeed a thing of distinction and establishes the endurance , sustenance , the ability to hold on to the pressures of the international cricket but any comparision with the classy and non-pareil Vishy is something in poor taste . Vishy played when everybody except Gavaskar failed and vishy produced the aestheticism ofhigh quality batsmanship against the high quality bowling . Remember the days of vishy went without protective gears and being up against the likes of Holding , Truman , Lillee was no joke and he played with style , authority and flair . Both Vishy and Dravid are great sons of the country and to suggest that they belong to one particular state is like singing to the tune of Thackerays.Sehwag weilds the power of willow when the strip is stripped off all life .
Reply | Forword | Report Abuse
sehwag
by Charan on 2008-04-06 02:53:20.064125+05:30
Harsha , Sehwags innings was great but they come very rarely and he is never consistent , selecting him in the team is like buying a lottery ticket, hoping he would fire today , Shouldn’t our captains pick players who gives us consistant performance rather than just hopes which comes true once in a while. I don’t think there has been no other player who has been given so many opportunities like him, it’s like India has to play with 10 batsmen every time because he would score only once in a while. The theory of maintaining his style is all good. I am not saying he should change his style of batting but shouldn’t our captains think how much is his success ratio compared to the kind of opportunities he had been given does he contributes each time India bats. Choc and Chesses would be the apt caption.
Reply | Forword | Report Abuse
Son of the soil theory - I disagree
by MJ on 2008-04-05 23:01:01.449967+05:30
Harsha, I have been an avid reader of your articles and admire your vast cricketing knowledge.However in your articles I completely disagree when you use phrases like "son of Bangalore". This attitude promotes son of the soil theory and has brought India to where it is right now. People like Bal Thackrey and Raj Thackrey are doing the same - "Son of Maharashtra". Vishwanath and Dravid are national heroes, they appeal extends beyond Bangalore.You have clearly disappointed me. I am finding it hard to distinguish between you and Bal/Raj Thackrey.
Reply | Forword | Report Abuse
Bholge
by Pehalwan Tiwari on 2008-04-05 17:42:52.784744+05:30
Bhogle is funny. whenever he writes something good about anybody that guy goes pauper in a few days. Bhogle thought Dravid and sehwag wrote poetry on a cricket pitch in chenai. I do not what Bholge will write now once these guys have been proven mediocre on sporting pitches?
Reply | Forword | Report Abuse
Shaadi Matrimonials Get Marriage Proposals by Email EVERYDAY!
Register FREE on Naukri.com. 200000+ Hot Job Openings!
Book International flights & get 10000 Money Back
Flowers & Gifts
Send flowers & Gifts
Express Classifieds Post and view free classifieds ad
Express Astrology Know what's in the stars for you
Featured Ads
© 2008 Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Ltd. All rights reserved
The Indian Express Group | Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Work With Us | Site Map